- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
i use the ADC_SAR_SEQ with Input Range 0.0 ± 1.024V (Differential)-Input +-VREF, Build is succesfull but i get following information:
ADD: sdb.M0065: information: Analog terminal "vdac_ref" on ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10 is unconnected.
* C:\Users\Tom\Documents\PSoC Creator\4.1\Downloads ( 4.1).cylib\ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10\PSoC5\ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10.cysch (Signal: vdac_ref)
* C:\Users\Tom\Documents\PSoC Creator\4.1\Downloads ( 4.1).cylib\ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10\PSoC5\ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10.cysch (Shape_798)
* C:\Users\Tom\Documents\PSoC Creator\4.1\Downloads ( 4.1).cylib\ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10\PSoC5\ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10.cysch (Shape_885)
Normally i would have expected vref must to be connected.
Now i'm not sure i can ignore this message?
thank you in advance
Thomas
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
PSoC 5 Architecture
-
PSoC 5LP
- Tags:
- adc_sar_seq
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thomas,
It is informational only. I believe you can ignore the message.
If you double-click on any of the informational notes, it will bring up ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10.cysch. It's possible that whoever designed the component didn't perform enough error checking validation. Hence the unnecessary info notes.
Note: I've had other issues I have voiced with this component. An alternate consideration I chose to use is to call the ADC_SAR component and a separate AMux. This requires that I control the AMux myself. No prob. I've got a bit of a 'control' personal issue.
Len
"Engineering is an Art. The Art of Compromise."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thomas,
It is informational only. I believe you can ignore the message.
If you double-click on any of the informational notes, it will bring up ADC_SAR_SEQ_v2_10.cysch. It's possible that whoever designed the component didn't perform enough error checking validation. Hence the unnecessary info notes.
Note: I've had other issues I have voiced with this component. An alternate consideration I chose to use is to call the ADC_SAR component and a separate AMux. This requires that I control the AMux myself. No prob. I've got a bit of a 'control' personal issue.
Len
"Engineering is an Art. The Art of Compromise."
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Lan,
thanks. Ok i will ignore this message. In the worst case i can switch back to seperate MUX and ADC, then I do not get this message.
Normally i use the combination with seperate MUX and ADC.
Thomas