9 Replies Latest reply on Sep 19, 2013 4:22 PM by naman.jain

    Ram Usage of PSoC4

    user_1377889
              Can someone tell me what the 1300 bytes go for a program like this?   
      Bob   
        • 1. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
          junichi.hiraoka
                  Hi Bob   
          It's consumed by srand() / mathematical group   
             
          Flash used: 1280 of 32768 bytes (3.9%).   
          SRAM used: 228 of 4096 bytes (5.6%).   
          • 2. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
            user_1377889

            @PSoC73:

               

            Yes, of course I know that srand() is consuming my sram! (Sometimes I may look stupid, but I am not!)

               

            The point is that there is no math routine (not even srand()) that may take 1000 bytes of precious sram for nothing!

               

            This is obviously a(nother) library error with the m0 libs. And: Yes, I already filed a MyCase and will keep you all informed.

               

             

               

            Bob

            • 3. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
              junichi.hiraoka
                      Hi   
              I see there is no math routines except srand.   
              But, I think srand come with other math group routines.   
              Maybe these are consume sram, even if you didn use.   
              It is no help.   
              • 4. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
                junichi.hiraoka
                        When refine the project setting   
                Optimize for SIZE and turn off DEBUG   
                sram consumption can reduce 2,400 to 1,300 byte.   
                   
                Flash used: 2216 of 32768 bytes (6.8%).   
                SRAM used: 1300 of 4096 bytes (31.7%).   
                • 5. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
                  user_14586677

                  I must be blind, did not Bob originally state his SRAM consumption was 1300

                     

                  bytes, are your last numbers incorrect PSOc73 ? They show only FLASH change.

                     

                   

                     

                  Regards, Dana.

                  • 6. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
                    junichi.hiraoka
                            Oh, that was wrong   
                    I am confusing original SRAM consumption as 2,400bytes.   
                    Optimizing and DEGUG flag will no help for it.   
                    • 7. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
                      user_1377889

                      I dug a bit further into that matter and evovled this to be a library problem.

                         

                      When a library function is used, rather often a global returncode is set named "errno" which allows for analyzing the reason of ailure. This is commonly used for OSses and since GCC libraries are used for this, "errno.h" is included which in turn loads a library "reentrant.h" which allocates data-structures of 1kbyte size just to maintain multitask- and context switching which so far would be a bit too much for a PSoC4.

                         

                       

                         

                      Bob

                      • 8. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
                        user_14586677

                        The "Linux" conundrum, GCC, public tools vs commercial tools.

                           

                        In charge of ones own destiny, or not.

                           

                         

                           

                        Regards, Dana.

                        • 9. Re: Ram Usage of PSoC4
                          naman.jain

                          Cypress has resolved this issue in their upcoming version of Creator i.e Creator 3.0. This will be released in October, 13.

                             

                          I got the beta version of Creator and this issue is no more available in Creator. They have updated the compiler of PSoC4 to later releases in Creator 3.0.

                             

                          Regards,

                             

                          Rave