STM32F407 + CYW43455 platform file for wiced?

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
jina_4171326
Level 2
Level 2
First like given

i have stm32f407 discovery board which is same as a STM32f417..

also one EVB which is with CYW43455.. same as like LSR-LWB 4343 board.

i'm using LSR-lwb 4343 platform file and "CYW943455EVB_02" platform file for make my own platform file.

i want to platform file for this setup. can you help me pls.?

0 Likes
1 Solution
RaktimR_11
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
500 replies posted 250 replies posted 100 replies posted

You can refer to the STM32F469 porting in WICED​ to understand the platform organization in WICED Studio. Your idea of combining both of the platforms are correct.

On a very High level, source files for the host side (STM32F4xx) are mostly in platform.c, platform.h, platform_config.h which can be re-used from LSR-LWB 4343 and then comes the platform.mk file which needs to be modified with the makefile from CYW943455EVB_02.

NVRAM file (wifi_nvram_image) can be re-used from CYW943455EVB_02 for testing purposes.

View solution in original post

4 Replies
RaktimR_11
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
500 replies posted 250 replies posted 100 replies posted

You can refer to the STM32F469 porting in WICED​ to understand the platform organization in WICED Studio. Your idea of combining both of the platforms are correct.

On a very High level, source files for the host side (STM32F4xx) are mostly in platform.c, platform.h, platform_config.h which can be re-used from LSR-LWB 4343 and then comes the platform.mk file which needs to be modified with the makefile from CYW943455EVB_02.

NVRAM file (wifi_nvram_image) can be re-used from CYW943455EVB_02 for testing purposes.

it's really useful for me thanks

0 Likes

Wiced is missing “WICED/WWD/internal/chips/43455/wwd_ap.c", is your problem solved?

0 Likes

CYW43455 is not supported in WICED; only supported for Linux hosts. Hence, you don't see those files in WICED (earlier response is not perfectly valid anymore).