PSoC 6 BLE Module with external antenna?

Tip / Sign in to post questions, reply, level up, and achieve exciting badges. Know more

cross mob
PascalS
Level 4
Level 4
25 replies posted 10 replies posted 10 questions asked

Hi,

in general, my question is shown in the caption. So when will cypress release a BLE Module based on PSoC 6 with external antenna? In the moment we use the PSoC 4 based module 202007-01 with external antenna (witch PSoC Creator). But our next application has to support BLE 5 and we need more cpu resources than in PSoC 4. Our project launch is in Q1 2018. Is ist suitable to wait for it?

Best regards!

0 Likes
1 Solution
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello!

Apologies for the very late response. For a PSoC 6 based BLE module, we plan to release it mid-Q2 2018.

In saying this, could you provide a bit more details on what you need in terms of features and functionality? Do you need any analog or digital resources to interface with sensors, need capactive-sensing, audio features, etc. or just the BLE functionality?

Thanks and appreciate the question!

View solution in original post

3 Replies
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello!

Apologies for the very late response. For a PSoC 6 based BLE module, we plan to release it mid-Q2 2018.

In saying this, could you provide a bit more details on what you need in terms of features and functionality? Do you need any analog or digital resources to interface with sensors, need capactive-sensing, audio features, etc. or just the BLE functionality?

Thanks and appreciate the question!

PascalS
Level 4
Level 4
25 replies posted 10 replies posted 10 questions asked

Hello,

Our main aim in using BLE 5 is to enlarge the range and / or the datarate of our device. The higher cpu ressources (cpu frequency) are used for faster protocol handling and maybe the opportunity to use a RTOS. Right now we are not interested in any additional analog components.

Can you tell us when there will be a PSOC Creator version which will support BLE 5.0?

Thanks in advance!

Pascal

0 Likes
Anonymous
Not applicable
0 Likes