Dec 14, 2020
07:02 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 14, 2020
07:02 PM
Hi Sir,
我目前想对比下PSOC63 BLE 和PSOC4200BLE 功耗的问题,主要参数如下:
连接间隔600ms;
connection latency: 2;
supervision timeout :20S,
广播间隔是1S,
根据从论坛上下载的EXCL POWER calculator评估文档,根据估算的平均电流消耗+深度睡眠所需的电流,PSOC63BLE (10.04+6.8)<PSOC4200BLE(14.53+1.3)uA ,算出的PSOC4200BLE的平均电流消耗比PSOC63BLE还低些,按道理上同等测试条件下,应该PSOC63Ble的功耗会低些,请问我这里是哪里功耗评估出问题了吗?谢谢
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Tags:
- calculator
1 Solution
Dec 15, 2020
01:56 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 15, 2020
01:56 AM
5 Replies
Dec 14, 2020
07:48 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 14, 2020
07:48 PM
PSOC 4200 BLE深度睡眠下1.3uA的功耗数据是哪里得出的?
Dec 14, 2020
11:58 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 14, 2020
11:58 PM
Hi Shiping,
根据文档AN92584 ,谢谢。
Dec 15, 2020
01:21 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 15, 2020
01:21 AM
按这个方法计算的话,P6跟P4 BLE最低功耗理论值确实是差不多的,因为P6是双核架构,DSM模式下双核比单核功耗肯定要高一些。
Dec 15, 2020
01:40 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 15, 2020
01:40 AM
Hi Shiping,
谢谢,请问在那种情况下,可以使PSOC63BLE的功耗更低些,相比于PSOC4200ble,客户的蓝牙参数是:
连接间隔600ms(有可能还会调);
connection latency: 2;
supervision timeout :20S,
广播间隔是1S,
客户每次传的数据量不大,客户使用的资源很少,Flash最少256KB,需要12位的AD,GPIO最多使用5个。感谢
Dec 15, 2020
01:56 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 15, 2020
01:56 AM
在这些BLE参数条件下,通过计算表得出的功耗基本就是最低功耗了。