Specification Revision Field for an Explicit Contract - KBA218971
Anonymous
Not applicable
Mar 22, 2017
03:15 AM
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
Mar 22, 2017
03:15 AM
Author: ShifangZ_26 Version: *A
Translation - Japanese: Explicit Contract の Specification Revision フィールドについて- KBA218971- Community Translated (JA)
Question:
What should the Specification Revision field be for an explicit contract?
Answer:
1) The Specification Revision field should have one of the following values (except 11b):
- 00b – Revision 1.0
- 01b – Revision 2.0
- 10b – Revision 3.0
- 11b – Reserved; not to be used
2) GoodCRC message refer to KBA229728.
3) Details of how various revisions interoperate (except GoodCRC) are as follows:
Labels
- Tags:
- ccg1
- ccg2
- ccg3. ccg4
- cortex-m0
- ez-pda ccg1 type-c port controller
- ez-pda ccg2 type-c cable controller
- ez-pda ccg3 type-c port controller
- ez-pda ccg4: two-port type-c controller with power delivery
- pd3.0
- type-c
Rate this article:
Contributors
-
This widget could not be displayed.Anonymous