cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Knowledge Base Articles

Specification Revision Field for an Explicit Contract - KBA218971

Anonymous
Not applicable

Specification Revision Field for an Explicit Contract - KBA218971

Author: ShifangZ_26          Version: *A

Translation - Japanese: Explicit Contract の Specification Revision フィールドについて- KBA218971- Community Translated (JA)

Question:
What should the Specification Revision field be for an explicit contract?

Answer:

1) The Specification Revision field should have one of the following values (except 11b):

  • 00b – Revision 1.0
  • 01b – Revision 2.0
  • 10b – Revision 3.0
  • 11b – Reserved; not to be used

2) GoodCRC message refer to KBA229728.

3) Details of how various revisions interoperate (except GoodCRC) are as follows:

Untitled.png

0 Likes
Version history
Revision #:
1 of 1
Last update:
‎Mar 22, 2017 03:15 AM
Updated by:
Anonymous
 
Contributors