- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I am thinking about moving my design for an Amateur Radio device from the current PSoC 3 to the PSoC 5. Since the PSoC 5 has greater memory capacity and such, I wanted to get the communities option if creating a custom component is feasible. The device (a transceiver) current uses a DUAL 1-OF-4 FET MULTIPLEXER/DEMULTIPLEXER (SN74cbt3253). It is simply bunch of AND and Inverter gates.
The over all goal is too reduce the number of outboard components as possible.
Just kicking around ideas.
Regards,
Ron
- Labels:
-
PSoC 5LP
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
PSoC3 and PSoC5 internal hardware capabilities are quite the same. I have often changed the target device of a project with only very rare problems. So when your project runs on a PSoC3 you will probably get it running on a PSoC5. Just get hands on a CY8CKIT-059, that's the cheapest way for you to test that.
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for the comments.
odissey1: Yes, the outboard component it is being used as quadrature decoder/encoder. I don't understand the "~1K for PSoC, apart from 5 oHm in this part". I will need to research the switching time of the outboard component verses the PSoC 5, for sure.
Bob: Perhaps just a bit of misunderstanding. The current device uses outboard components for the quadrature decoding. The goal is to redesign the device using a PSoC 5 and potentially replace a number of the outboard components with PSoC 5 components. But at any rate, yes, I will most definitely purchase a development kit.
Regards,
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hum, bummer. I will look into the PSoC op amps available. Maybe I can replace the outboard ops amps with PSoC op amps. If that is not the case, then there is not much use in switching to the PSoC 5 (from the 3) (other than life cycle support).
Thanks !
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The first link refers to the radio I am referring to. I have taken up production of the radio where David left off. The re-introduced Peaberry V2 named Omnia SDR Basic should be available by the end of November. It is pretty much the same as the original Peaberry V2. As mentioned, the reason for this post is to explore the possibilities available with the PSoC 5 in moving forward with new and improved designs for the radio.
Regards,
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Putting it to the point: PSoC3 and 5 have got identical components. Full Stop.
The µP core is quite different, allowing faster program execution on the PSoC5, and using some programming techniques (arrays of pointers to functions) without taking precautions.
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Bob,
Point taken.
Thanks,
Ron