- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello all,
which is the difference between the handmade code in the example project and the function CySysSFlashWriteUserRow()?
Is the example prj obsolete?
Best regards
Massimo
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Tags:
- psoc 4 ble flash
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, your guess makes sense. Indeed, that function was written after the example Day029_BLE_SFlash_Write.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In essence, there is no difference between the two APIs as the both call supervisory ROM APIs to conduct SFlash write.
I don't think that example is obsolete. Let me know if you have encountered any problem when using it?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In the previous projects we used CYBLE-014008 and wrote the user flash row with the example prj's code without problems
Now, we started using CYBLE-212006, that has 256 bytes per row
Before touching the example prj's code, I wandered around finding CySysSFlashWriteUserRow: I like it because it hides all the internals
I asked if the example prj is obsolete because it does not add value to CySysSFlashWriteUserRow, so it is like if the function was written after the example (100_Projects_in_100_Days is our first choice)
To add some value, it should show, if feasible, how to get small "sectors" out of one row, as an example, 4 sectors with 32 bytes from a row of 128 (to achieve a "wear-leveling" in case of small chunks of data)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, your guess makes sense. Indeed, that function was written after the example Day029_BLE_SFlash_Write.