- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi.
I am trying to migrate to SDK 3.1.2 from SDK 2.4.1
By the way result of snip.scan is showing a lot of difference.
Below are the results of 2.4.1
==================================================================
Starting Wiced v2.4.1
Platform BCM9WCDUSI09 initialised
Started ThreadX v5.5
Initialising NetX_Duo v5.6
Creating Packet pools
WWD SDIO interface initialised
WLAN MAC Address : 40:2C:F4:E8:CE:FD
WLAN Firmware : wl0: Feb 10 2014 11:29:55 version 5.90.230.7 FWID 01-555f783e
Waiting for scan results...
# Type BSSID RSSI Rate Chan Security SSID
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Infra 3C:A3:15:01:27:57 -78 54.0 1 WEP ZIO
1 Infra 74:72:F2:31:B9:5B -81 54.0 1 WEP dsinnocar-120
2 Infra 00:08:9F:66:3C:C5 -80 54.0 7 WPA2 AES ss
3 Infra 00:26:66:CA:7B:3C -50 300.0 11 WPA2 AES iptime_UM
4 Infra E8:AB:FA:10:AF:C1 -72 300.0 11 Open Wifi-Repeater
5 Infra 64:E5:99:87:5F:A8 -65 150.0 9 WPA AES iptime_oh
6 Infra 00:26:66:C8:D5:5A -77 300.0 11 Open iptime
7 Infra 90:9F:33:22:5F:14 -54 300.0 8 WPA2 AES RND
8 Infra 64:E5:99:60:7F:9C -64 300.0 9 WPA2 AES ES_700Z
9 Infra 00:0E:2E:E0:CF:88 -53 300.0 6 WPA2 AES ZIO_smart_Zigbee
10 Infra 00:01:36:9E:E2:08 -51 300.0 4 WPA2 AES
11 Infra 00:01:36:9E:E2:06 -51 300.0 4 WPA2 Mixed SK_WiFiE205
Scan complete in 1295 milliseconds
==================================================================
Below is a result of 3.1.2
==================================================================
Starting WICED v3.1.2
Platform BCM9WCDUSI09 initialised
Started ThreadX v5.6
Initialising NetX_Duo v5.7_sp1
Creating Packet pools
WWD SDIO interface initialised
WLAN MAC Address : 40:2C:F4:E8:CE:FD
WLAN Firmware : wl0: Nov 7 2014 16:03:45 version 5.90.230.12 FWID 01-0
Waiting for scan results...
# Type BSSID RSSI Rate Chan Security SSID
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Infra 00:26:66:CA:7B:3C -82 300.0 11 WPA2 AES iptime_UM
1 Infra 90:9F:33:22:5F:14 -92 300.0 8 WPA2 AES RND
2 Infra 00:0E:2E:E0:CF:88 -82 300.0 6 WPA2 AES ZIO_smart_Zigbee
Scan complete in 1566 milliseconds
==================================================================
Why do I have these differences?
I am using BCM9WCDUSI09 Platform
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Here is the differences in wifi_nvram_image.h file between 2.4.1 and 3.1.2:
18,21d23
< #ifdef __cplusplus
< extern "C" {
< #endif
<
83,84d84
< "edonthd=-70" "\x00"
< "edoffthd=-76" "\x00"
86,90d85
<
<
< #ifdef __cplusplus
< } /* extern "C" */
< #endif
Seyhan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I don't know the answer, but I do notice in your 3.1.2 scan results the RSSI seems pretty far down "in the dirt" whereas in your 2.4.1 they have a much nicer distribution. Has something been modified in regards to the antenna selection? I don't know if it's possible, but do you somehow have antenna diversity enabled in 3.1.2 for a board that doesn't have a 2nd antenna? Just something I noticed...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks your reply.
I am using the "WM-N-BM-09-EVB" board.
The same conditions (same board, same place, without changing antenna) with the results obtained by downloading the snip.scan of 2.4.1 and 3.1.2
Thanks...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I have tested the USI09 module on different evaluation board and it works the same on both releases, SDK-3.1.2 and SDK-2.4.1.
Do you have specific changes made for your application?
Seyhan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
There are no change in my application.
I'm just add BCM9WCDUSI09 platform.
In matters discovered during testing, "wifi_nvram_image.h" to copy the file from the SDK-2.4.1 and then download the scan results of it came out almost the same. (Not use"wifi_nvram_image.h" of "platforms.BCM9WCDUSI09.patch")
I do not know whether the test results are accurate.
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content