- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Ok here we go:
*** ERROR L220: INVALID INPUT MODULE
MODULE: .\DP8051\DP8051_Keil_903\Debug\UM6 Sensor Test.lib (-----)
*** Internal Reference: processlib3The command 'LX51.exe' failed with exit code '3'.
If I put Browse Information to FALSE in the Compiler's Build Settings it
links correctly but cannot (obviously) debug otherwise it gives that error.
This is weird !
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Are you debugging with your own custom module? If this is the case, you should have your module debugged first.
BTW. I would suggest not using those "4 letter words", just to respect all other members here. Please
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Posting your project would help forum members look at the source of
the problem.
"File", "Create Workspace Bundle", and post the project.
Regards, Dana.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I cannot find a way to edit or delete posts.
The last one is that which states that if I select no browse information
the linker works properly.
I don't seem to have used the "4 letter words" !
If you mean the "wtf" acronym... wow! ok, ok!
Just make a new library project, put some code into it,
then make a new project and link against it (dependancies: code flag)
and compiler additional include file dir to point to the .h of the library.
I expected that I could debug the whole thing and surely not a
linker problem when I flag "browse information" in compiler settings.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Unfortunately there is no forume edit/delete capability.
Regards, Dana.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
We've requested options to delect and edit for a looooooooooooooooooooooong time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, since a VERY long time. I was promised that changes will be made and they would be made september 2012. I understand that there have been some personal changes done since then and a lot of effort was needed to lauch PSoC4.
One of my top-requirements that was promised (!!!) to be fulfilled soon was a thread where we contributors could post the non-working, errors, mis-behavours and complains, a thread for the software-team to get knowledge about the edges and spikes of the forum-sw. I really doubt if "they" really know about every bug without a bug-tracking software. And sometimes I doubt if "they" are reading posts like this and if "their" boss knows about...
A quick way out? (I admitt that few of my suggestions have been picked up yet, but some were)
Install a bug-tracking software (ANY open source will do, no self-written), permit access to the top-ten contributors only to reduce noise and handle the reports appropiately.
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I fully support Bob's comments in this area. The forum has the promise
of cut and paste and edit and.... but really is a strange furstrating animal at
times. Wastes a lot of engineering time.
Regards, Dana.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Good to have hit the mark, hope to have hit the nerve as well (Smile [smileys do not work for me. WHY???])
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The next one they need to fix is the small text box.
Lucky I have the big one this time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
There is a tombola where you can draw a small or a big window...
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Oh, what can I win? Or do I need to predict beforehand what I will get?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@hli
You can win a large window giving you room to express everything you'd like to.
When you only get a small window you have two choices: start all over or .zip your words.
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sorry, Roberto, you're right. Let's focus on your problem again.
Can you make things a bit easier for us and provide us with a complete project that shows the bug. It would save us some time to try to reproduce everything.
Bob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
BL51 BANKED LINKER/LOCATER V4.03 - SN: MSC1210
COPYRIGHT KEIL ELEKTRONIK GmbH 1987 - 2000
"STARTUP.obj",
"USBJmpTb.obj",
"dscr.obj",
".\EZUSB.LIB",
"periph.obj",
"FW.obj"
TO "Dummyboot"
RAMSIZE(256)
*** FATAL ERROR L220: INVALID INPUT MODULE
MODULE: .\EZUSB.LIB (RESUME)
Target not created
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
路径里有中文或者空格。